MECHANISMS OF CULTURAL INNOVATION ACTIVITY OF STUDENTS IN HIGHER EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS
Abstract
This article is a scientific study of the mechanisms of formation of a culture of innovative activity of students of technical higher education. A number of references have been analyzed in defining the directions of scientific research, and the creation of educational technologies that allow students to dramatically increase the innovative learning environment and mastery indicators that can lead to a culture of innovative thinking has been identified as the main direction and goal of our research. As a result of our research, the need to create opportunities for students to use modern literature to increase their interest in science and improve their mastery. The article provides information on how to solve this problem, as well as the creation of electronic textbooks, manuals, task sets and electronic manuals for students of technical disciplines in several branches and their capabilities. Recommendations and suggestions are also made on the mechanisms of formation and development of integration of higher education institutions and industrial enterprises, the introduction of innovative technologies in the educational process and the formation of an innovative environment.
Keywords: innovation, integration, innovative learning environment, e-literature, innovative ability, learning process, independent learning, e-learning, mastery indicators, innovative thinking culture, learning development mechanisms, innovative practice platform, student personal indicators, self-assessment system and individual control.
References
Shelton K. A. and Arciszewski T. 2007. Formal innovation criteria. International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology IJCAT 30(1/2).
Amabile, T. M., R. Conti, H. Coon, J. Lazenby and M. Herron. 1996. Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal 39(5): 1154‒1185.
Shavinina, V. S. 2003. Understanding innovation: Some important issues. London: Elsevier Science.
Engeström, J. 2005. Why some social network services work and others don’t ‒ or: the case for objectcantered sociality. http://zengestrom.com/blog/2005/ 04/why_some_social.html (Accessed 20 October 2008).
Laursen, K. and A. Salter. 2006. Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal 27(2): 131‒150.
Brewer, D. and Tierney, W. (2012), “Barriers to innovation in the US education”, in Wildavsky, B., Kelly, A. and Carey, K. (Eds), Reinventing Higher Education: The Promise of Innovation, Harvard Education Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 11-40.
Su Wangchu, Diao Hailin, Peng Qiong. Construction and practice of practical teaching system for innovative education [J]. Higher Education Forum, 2012, 7:37 -39.
Zhaoji Yu Shenyang, Songtao Zhou Shenyang. “An Analysis of Influencing Factors of Innovative Education and Development Proposals” International Conference on Education Reform and Modern Management. The authors - Published by Atlantis Press. 2014.
Osolind, K. (2012), “Revolutionary vs evolutionary innovation”, Reinvention Consulting, available at: www.reinventioninc.com/revolutionvsevolution (accessed October 16, 2016).
Yu, D. and Hang, C.C. (2010), “A reflective review of disruptive innovation theory”, International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 435-452, available at: http://onlinelibrary. wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00272.x/full
Meyer, A., Rose, D. and Gordon, D. (2014), Universal Design of Learning: Theory and Practice, CAST Professional Publishing, Wakefield, MA.
Extreme Learning (2012), available at: www.extreme-learning.org/ (accessed September 22, 2016).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Declaration/Copyright transfer:
1. In consideration of the undertaking set out in paragraph 2, and upon acceptance by ANGLISTICUM for publication of the manuscript in the Journal, I/We hereby assign and transfer publication rights to ANGLISTICUM, whereas I/We retain the copyright for the manuscript. This assignment provides ANGLISTICUM the sole right and responsibility to publish the manuscript in its printed and online version, and/or in other media formats.
2. In consideration of this assignment, ANGLISTICUM hereby undertakes to prepare and publish the manuscript in the Journal, subject only to its right to refuse publication if there is a breach of the Author’s warranty in paragraph 4 or if there are other reasonable grounds.
3. Editors and the editorial board of ANGLISTICUM are empowered to make such editorial changes as may be necessary to make the Manuscript suitable for publication.
4. I/We hereby acknowledge that: (a) The manuscript submitted is an original work and that I/We participated in the work substantively and thus I/We hereby are prepared to take public responsibility for the work; (b) I/We hereby have seen and approved the manuscript as submitted and that the manuscript has not either been published, submitted or considered for publication elsewhere; (c) The text, illustration, and any other materials included in the manuscript do not infringe upon any existing copyright or other rights of anyone.
5. I/We hereby indemnify ANGLISTICUM and the respective Editors of the Journal as mentioned in paragraph 3, and hold them harmless from any loss, expense or damage occasioned by a claim or suit by a third party for copyright infringement, or any suit arising out of any breach of the foregoing warranties as a result of publication of the manuscript.
